Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Milla Goodpussy wrote: 100's near thousands of post about afk cloaky camping, and ccp refuses to acknowledge that its a problem That's because it's not a problem except for the weak, lazy and un-creative. What I tell afk cloakers: [Typhoo...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.05 16:48:07
|
162. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
epicurus ataraxia wrote: VolatileVoid wrote: lilol' me wrote: VolatileVoid wrote: Too often read here about unoccupied space. To clarify: The systems that are actually empty are not worth anything which is the reason why they are, wer...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.05 13:51:30
|
163. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Serene Repose wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Speedkermit Damo wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: KC Kamikaze wrote: The "Protection" of tomorrow you speak of is todays rental agreement. The new system will be great. Small groups can claim a...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 19:18:29
|
164. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Agent Known wrote: People rent because they don't have a supercap fleet to grind down structures or defend themselves when they get welped. The current sov mechanics vastly favors alliances with large capital fleets who are able to grind stru...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 19:16:55
|
165. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lena Lazair wrote: Kah'Les wrote: You know NA. is just renters right? Pretty much all of whom would have no reason to continue to be renters after this change. NC.'s supercaps will be no particular threat to them. Sure, you can make an ex...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 19:09:21
|
166. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
omg omg omg, I was reading a post about the ESS and I'm like "can we put this node thing in an anomaly, that would e hilarious". Please do this CCP so in addition to being a non-consensual PVP game, EVE can haven't non-consensual PVE too!!!
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 18:47:42
|
167. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Speedkermit Damo wrote: He doesn't benefit from the situation. For all his pathetic "tough guy" act. He's bricking it because his alliance didn't get exactly what they wanted from this sov revamp. That's just useless guilt by association....
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 17:47:24
|
168. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: The fact that the idea is dumb and will be a waste of time? Just because someone benefits from a situation doesn't mean that can't see what's wrong with it. So small gangs are gonna be having fun, big alli...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 17:44:22
|
169. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Speedkermit Damo wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: KC Kamikaze wrote: The "Protection" of tomorrow you speak of is todays rental agreement. The new system will be great. Small groups can claim and hold sov. We have multiboxing alt corps ho...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 17:35:14
|
170. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sentinel Eeex wrote: Ok, the great plan is to turn "EVE Online" into "Roaming Gangs Online" "Even Bluer Donuts Online". Got it. Fixed. Will be funny to watch the post June disappointment set in with the unrealistically optimistic crowd.
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 17:32:27
|
171. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kah'Les wrote: Lena Lazair wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: i didn't say take it, i said squash you What are you going to squash? Small alliances won't drop ihubs or station eggs. They'll have a TCU and a few POS's. When you come throug...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 17:28:10
|
172. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Delt0r Garsk wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Karash Amerius wrote: I am thinking the Troll Laser needs to be restricted to a heavier ship such as a battle cruiser or above. Love the tears here...gr...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 17:09:24
|
173. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Karash Amerius wrote: I am thinking the Troll Laser needs to be restricted to a heavier ship such as a battle cruiser or above. Love the tears here...great work CCP. Definitely not. If you can't...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 16:42:51
|
174. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Countered by even more ceptors, or just leaving that system and spamming the ones around it. This will not turn out how you think it will lol. So more ships wins in eve, wow that's a shocker. Also an at...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 16:19:42
|
175. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: So basically the only tweak I can spot being needed right off the bat is to either: 1: Keep the (short) range the same between the T1 and T2 Entosis links, forcing those wishing to captur...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 16:12:36
|
176. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Igor Nappi wrote: I find it hard to believe that 0.0 income is too low considering there's currently people who are willing to pay somebody else for the right to use 0.0 systems. This is the general misunderstanding. Null income isn't too lo...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 16:09:50
|
177. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: So basically the only tweak I can spot being needed right off the bat is to either: 1: Keep the (short) range the same between the T1 and T2 Entosis links, forcing those wishing to capture in close. 2: Make the fitting requirem...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 16:04:19
|
178. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rain6637 wrote: It disturbs me to see the use of broad usage statistics to make balance decisions and also validate them. I'm troubled by that too. Like the population one, i know I contributed to that because I moved 2 cyno alts into null s...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 16:02:41
|
179. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
RadiantShadow wrote: I can't tell if you are stupid or ... It won't make nullsec system ownership more desirable, it will make it POSSIBLE for smaller independent corps. Who really wants to pay for a game then pay some other player to RENT in ...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 15:32:22
|
180. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lord TGR wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: TL;DR this new system will fail for the same reason Dominion did, you can't herd cats. I don't see how this system'll make nullsec have fewer coalitions than it does today, considering the main reason we h...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2015.03.04 15:28:47
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |